Decided by the Press Council on appeal
Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign and The Irish Times
By: Posted on: 07-Dec-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
Ms A Ni Fhloinn and Sunday Independent
By: Posted on: 07-Dec-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
Mr Bev Cotton and the Irish Examiner
By: Posted on: 10-Oct-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
Mr Patrick Kelly and The Irish Times
By: Posted on: 10-Oct-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
Mr Patrick Kelly and The Irish Times
By: Posted on: 10-Oct-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
Mr C Garvey and the Irish Independent
By: Posted on: 07-Sep-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
The appeal from the complainant was heard by the Press Council of Ireland at its meeting on 07 September 2012. The Council decided to uphold the decision of the Press Ombudsman.
Mr Mark Connolly and Others and the Irish Examiner
By: Posted on: 06-Jul-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
The appeal from the complainant was heard by the Press Council of Ireland at its meeting on 06 July 2012. The Council decided to uphold the decision of the Press Ombudsman.
Colgan and The Irish Times
By: Posted on: 06-Jul-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of Ireland
The appeal from the complainant was heard by the Press Council of Ireland at its meeting on 06 July 2012. The Council decided to uphold the decision of the Press Ombudsman.
Mongey and the Irish Examiner
By: Posted on: 06-Jul-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council of IrelandThe appeal from the complainant was heard by the Press Council of Ireland at its meeting on 06 July 2012. The Council decided to uphold the decision of the Press Ombudsman.
Fitzgerald and The Irish Times
By: Posted on: 28-May-2012
Filed under:
Decision of the Press Council
The appeals were dealt with by the Press Council at its meeting on 28 May 2012.
The Complainants appealed against the Press Ombudsman’s decision not to investigate the truth and accuracy of certain statements in the article complained of. The Council noted that the Press Ombudsman’s decision was made on the grounds that these statements could not be investigated by him without reference to an earlier article which was out of time. This was an administrative decision by him. The Council decided there is no appeal from an administrative decision made by the Press Ombudsman.
The Council considered the appeal from the Newspaper and decided not to allow the appeal and to affirm the decision of the Press Ombudsman.
28 May 2012
Page 13 of 22